<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Writing as Process/Writing as Product</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cac.ophony.org/2007/10/01/writing-as-processwriting-as-product/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cac.ophony.org/2007/10/01/writing-as-processwriting-as-product/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:00:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boone</title>
		<link>http://cac.ophony.org/2007/10/01/writing-as-processwriting-as-product/comment-page-1/#comment-23216</link>
		<dc:creator>Boone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 20:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cac.ophony.org/2007/10/01/writing-as-processwriting-as-product/#comment-23216</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this interesting post, Luke.&#160; I share this professor&#039;s apprehension (fear, to call a spade a spade) about leaving such complex and elusive material in the hands of the less-than-prepared.&#160; But on reflection I think it&#039;s clear that a genuine struggle with the material is the only way for one to understand it thoroughly.&#160; Plato can&#039;t be learned by rote.&#160; So, in this case, the &quot;writing as process&quot; approach not only produces better writing, but is directly instrumental to a deeper comprehension of the course material.&#160; I&#039;d even go so far as to say that I&#039;d rather have students arrive organically at a misguided interpretation of Plato than to be spoon-fed a correct one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this interesting post, Luke.&nbsp; I share this professor&#39;s apprehension (fear, to call a spade a spade) about leaving such complex and elusive material in the hands of the less-than-prepared.&nbsp; But on reflection I think it&#39;s clear that a genuine struggle with the material is the only way for one to understand it thoroughly.&nbsp; Plato can&#39;t be learned by rote.&nbsp; So, in this case, the &quot;writing as process&quot; approach not only produces better writing, but is directly instrumental to a deeper comprehension of the course material.&nbsp; I&#39;d even go so far as to say that I&#39;d rather have students arrive organically at a misguided interpretation of Plato than to be spoon-fed a correct one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

