Hijab Punk

princesshijab

Hijab: (Arabic) Veil.

A philosophy that has originated in urban centers.  A transnational movement of modesty and subversiveness.  A response to misconceptions that Muslim women, and especially Muslim women who veil (or who hijab), are submissive, passive, victimized and the worth of two bearded goats (on a good day).  A response to Oprah pulling the burqa off of a brown woman on stage at Madison Square Garden circa 2002.

Burqa: (Pashto) A full-body veil that covers the face.  Seen in Queens during celebrations at Flushing Meadow Park.  Seen lifted up during the post-Taliban years in Afghanistan.  Seen torn off by American women (and in one comic book, by Wonder Woman as well).

cihanclassvisit2Hijab Punk styles… too numerous to count. But some examples are: Hijab combined with green nails, pink sneakers and an affinity with Rainbow Brite; Goth hijab girls who thrive on their mother’s kajal collection; Hijab with safety pins and Sid Vicious references on their t-shirt… the list goes on.

Ultimate Hijab Punk story to read: “Misli Midhib, Punk Rock Hijabi” by Cihan Kaan about a girl named Misli who is dropped down to the earth via a meteor and who covers her cosmic skin with a full hijab and performs Sufi whirls to disrupt the narratives of Muslim women.  One of the stories in the forthcoming short story collection titled: Halal Pork. Here is an excerpt from the story:

A nameless lightning bolt hit a magical Afghan carpet from a distant star,  carrying on it a wandering babushka caught in a world between the skies.  Drifting space rocks, a homeland memory that dropped her through our atmosphere onto the Central Asian steppe of Coney Island, New York. She walked the rustic shores, lived in broken amusement parks and worked silently inside sideshows.

Ultimate Hijab Punk artist to follow: Princess Hijab, a young woman based on the streets of Paris, who interweaves the philosophy of Adbusters and the Hijab.  (See photo above from Princess Hijab website). She describes herself as:

This is the story of a young woman fighting every day for a noble cause: she wants to “hijabize” advertising. Princess Hijab knows that L’Oréal and Dark&Lovely have been killing her little by little… When she was a teen, she heard about movements such as Adbuster; but since 9/11, things have changed… Princess Hijab will go on, veiled and alone, forever asserting her physical and mental integrity. By day, she wears a white veil, symbol of purity. By night, her black veil is the expression of her vengeful fight for a cause (custom ad). With her spray paint and black marker pen, she is out to hijabize advertising. Even Kate Moss is targeted

Cihan Kaan author of Halal Pork, forthcoming 2009, Up-Set Press Inc

Cihan Kaan author of Halal Pork (forthcoming, Up-Set Press)

Incorporating this concept of Hijab Punk, or the more popular (and more macho) Muslim Punk (which draws origins from punk garage bands and from the writer Hanif Kureish, the Pakistani/British novelist) into a standard Muslim Diaspora course at a college was the best thing I ever did as an academic. Not only was it “snooze proof” because Punk aesthetics is always so confrontational, brutally honest, and anti-establishment (which is what makes the term Muslim Punk so controversial), but it introduced a discussion of fashion, music, and film in the construction of one’s hybrid and sometimes transnational identity.  Its the fluidity of Hijab Punk or Muslim Punk that appealed to my students and myself.

cihanclassvisit6

Students listening to Kaan read.

Transformative Dialogue

I came accross this amazing stop motion animation by the surrealist Czech artist Jan Svankmajer. This animation is the first part of a trilogy called ‘dialogue’. Svankmajer has a quite interesting and somewhat disturbing take on communication. The animation captures perfectly what communication is supposed to be: a mutual transformation process. However, it is also disturbing, because at the end of this mutual process of transformation, communication produces copy cats. The animation raises some interesting questions about communication. How much we let ourselves transformed by our communicative encounters with others? Can communication be effective if we do not allow our opinion to change as a result of our communicative encounter with others? Can communication be effective when it leads to the eradication of differences?  These questions gravitate towards two opposite ends of a spectrum. Some food for thought.

Two Cultures, Two Kinds of Audiences, and Two Forms of Communication

Tuning into the current stream of our collective reflection upon last Friday’s symposium, here I put in my two cents. Like my fellow attendees, I found Jeff Jarvis’s Google speech extremely exciting and thought-provoking, which made him the perfect fit for the morning session. It is, however, Peter Elbow’s talk about the usefulness of occasional ignoring of the audience that resonates more deeply in my mind. I am currently reading his book, Writing with Power, and it allows me to think again about how the relationships between author/speaker and audience should change according to two different forms of communication, verbal and written. To reiterate the point he made, writing is more solitary and process-oriented than speaking is, so audience-forgetfulness can be a good strategy for early stages of writing. Elbow’s empiricist approach also classifies the different types of audiences such as safe or dangerous, caring or discouraging, real or imaginary, and so on. I found his notion of the ghost audience that we carry with us in our head particularly intriguing:

“The audience in our head usually affects us more when we write than when we speak. When we speak, the real audience is right there dominating our attention and drowning out other audiences. When we write, however, all audiences are in the head, even the real audience. In the dark of the brain a real audience is easily trampled by an insistent past audience” (187).

Elbow’s advice is that, in order to exorcize the demon of the dangerous internal audience that inhibits our words or thoughts, we need to actively “change” our audience and capitalize on the support of a loving audience that we once had or that we can imagine. I think that this suggestion could prove useful in improving our teaching methods, too.

Finally, attending the Institute’s symposium reminded me of C. P. Snow’s 1959 argument on the division of two cultures, the sciences and the humanities. I assume that in this case it is the division between business and academia whose cultures we try to bring together, as partly shown by Jarvis and Elbow. I see how these seemingly disparate fields can hit it off and have productive conversations in the right setting like this year’s symposium.

Gardner Teaches, Part 4

In this final segment from Gardner Campbell’s workshop “Speaker, Listener, Network: The Concept of Audience in a Web 2.0 World” from the 9th Annual Symposium on Commumication and Communication-Intensive Instruction, Gardner and the participants look at the “Mother of the All Funk Chords,” a Youtube mashup by the Israeli musician Kutiman, they discuss the implications of the notion that “you choose a channel; your audience will choose the channels after that.”

This video is 12 minutes long.

Gardner Teaches, Part 3

In this third segment from Gardner Campbell’s workshop “Speaker, Listener, Network: The Concept of Audience in a Web 2.0 World” from the 9th Annual Symposium on Commumication and Communication-Intensive Instruction, Gardner and the participants look at an advertisement from Kaplan University (featuring Uncle Phil) and explore the nature of authenticity and credibility in a Web 2.0 world, the implications of tools that empower the audience on “for-profit” higher education, and the challenges producers of information have in maintaining control over their intended messages once they get out.

This video is 10 minutes long.

Tweetripper, or, Geeking Out After the Symposium

Following the conversation via Twitter. Photo by Alan Levine.

Following the conversation via Twitter. Photo by Alan Levine.

If you attended the Symposium on May 1, you no doubt saw that Twitter played a major part in the event: as a topic of conversation (as in Gardner Campbell’s session), as a means of broadcasting what was happening over the course of the day, and as a way to connect with others out there in in the Interwebs interested in what we were talking about.

Our friends in media services wheeled over a beautiful 46″ flat panel display, which we used with Twitter Camp to display all tweets tagged #blsci as they came in. By the end of the evening portion of the event, there were almost 300 tweets on the Symposium from attendees as well as a few other folks chiming in or sharing our tweets with their networks. (See Boone Gorges’ great post on the use of Twitter as a backchannel at the Symposium for more on the impact of microblogging on the day’s conversations.)

Naturally, we wanted a record of all this and started looking into ways in which to pull all #blsci tweets and save them for posterity. Unfortunately, there was no one good option. The native Twitter search was ok, but only returned a few tweets at a time. Twazzup was very nice but only returned about 100 tweets. Hashtags.org returned even fewer results grouped according to no clear logic at all. (These sites are fine for following tweets live, but not so much for archiving old ones.) A Twitter contact in Texas suggested a Python script (scary) that didn’t quite work right either.

Then, our good friends Lucas Thurston and Zach Davis of Cast Iron Coding, the genius code-poet developers of our Video Oral Communication Assessment Tool (VOCAT), came up with a solution: a simple PHP script they called Tweetripper that dumped all the tweets we needed to a text file. When we ran it, Tweetripper, which came with simple but thorough instructions, gave us something that looks like this (these are just a few of the day’s tweets in reverse chronological order):


#blsci Elbow suggests we should learn the skill of ignoring audiences during speaking/writing. Says @jeffjarvis closed eyes during talk.
TiffanyPR
Fri, 01 May 2009 17:56:08 +0000

Elbow: first audience when writing must be yourself. #blsci
lwaltzer
Fri, 01 May 2009 17:50:59 +0000

A Twitterati gallery has emerged at the rear of the audience at #blsci. This might be related to the need for outlets.
boonebgorges
Fri, 01 May 2009 17:48:05 +0000

Afternoon speaker, Peter Elbow, is taking the stage. Author of "Writing With Power: Techniques for Mastering the Writing Process."; #blsci
TiffanyPR
Fri, 01 May 2009 17:48:01 +0000

Wish I was at #blsci!
katemo
Fri, 01 May 2009 17:36:52 +0000

Fantastically stimulating conversation at Baruch Communication Symposium #blsci. Boring academics? Nay. They are the Twittelligentsia!
alberrios
Fri, 01 May 2009 17:10:04 +0000

Perfect. Just what we were looking for: a way of creating a record of all the furious tweeting from a remarkably stimulating and memorable event.

Zach and Lucas wrote this script absolutely pro bono, in the interest of others out there like us interested in a way to archive tweets. They created something the community wanted and shared it, enabling others to tweak it and adapt it and develop it further. That is the spirit of open-source right there. So, in that spirit, here is the Tweetripper script for those not afraid of a command line interface. Use it well. If you modify it, let us know.

Gardner Teaches, Part 2

In this second segment from Gardner Campbell’s workshop “Speaker, Listener, Network: The Concept of Audience in a Web 2.0 World” from the 9th Annual Symposium on Commumication and Communication-Intensive Instruction, Gardner and the participants explore the concept of speaker and audience in the Emily Dickinson poem “This is My Letter to the World,” unpack the meditation on connectedness in the segment “Truck Stop” from the film 32 Short Films About Glenn Gould (the Youtube version of this film is embedded below workshop video for more easy viewing), and discuss some core defining principles of the Web 2.0 world.

In response to a question about how these tools have altered or challenged our sense of time, Gardner offers this wise nugget, which just about sums up his approach to thinking about all of this stuff:

Thinking at that meta level as much as we can without driving ourselves bananas is the only kind of thinking that persists through whatever the next tool is going to be.

This clip is about 25 minutes.

“Truck Stop,” from 32 Short Films About Glenn Gould.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rvhfqks7r2w[/youtube]

Gardner Teaches, Part I

This is the first in a series of posts presenting video from our 9th Annual Symposium on Communication and Communication-Intensive Instruction.

We’re going to start off with four videos (we’ll publish them over the next four days) from Gardner Campbell’s workshop “Speaker, Listener, Network: The Concept of Audience in a Web 2.0 World.”

What I love about this particular workshop is the generous balance in Gardner’s approach to Web 2.0: he talks with equal interest about the inanity present in much online conversation and the new implications for connectedness offered by the Web 2.0 world. Unlike many thinkers who’ve chimed in on communication in a Web 2.0 world, he sees it as neither a panacea or a harbinger of doom. His interest is in exploring the broad, rich ideas generated by these new methods of communication, and in generating more questions than answers.

We were so fortunate to have Gardner play such a significant role in our Symposium for the second straight year. His enthusiasm was infectious, and his social note taking was prodigious.

In this first segment, Gardner and the attendees of his workshop explore Twistori and Twittervision, two Twitter apps that offer provocative examples of how “connectedness” is changing in the Web 2.0 world. Unfortunately, we weren’t able to catch the beginning of this workshop; we pick things up a few minutes in, and this first video is a shade under 20 minutes long.

Reflecting on the Symposium

Planning to steal Mikhail’s thunder at our upcoming staff meeting this Wednesday, here I am/writing to open up the blog space for reflections on our symposium. Please contribute.

It was a good day, this past Friday. I think I most enjoyed its dynamic, happening quality, as if in defiance of the rain outside. And I did indeed get out of my academic bubble to look around a bit and see and hear what those non-academics think about writing. One of my favorite parts was the opening lecture, actually, Jeff Jarvis’ talk. (At the Players’ Club, Olga was telling me how much she enjoyed Peter Elbow’s talk because of its introspective quality, and I agreed with her. The upbeat, popping quality of the first speaker got me, however, and I think it was an excellent choice to start with in the morning.) At moments, I wondered at the striking American-ness of the entire speech, and I felt this with all my convoluted sense of belonging and Americanized brain. I liked the way the speaker opened up the creative act for necessary mistakes (“Everything is miscellaneous”), inherent flair (“elegant organization”), and I loved the little spiritual tag that came with the package (“Make mistakes well, and don’t be evil”). Peter Elbow, on the other hand, wanted to celebrate “the glory of writing” and that inward turn that it brings, and I was nodding big time then too.

What about you, my fellow audience-members? :)

E-mail Etiquette

E-mails from your students driving you crazy? The latest “Ms. Mentor” column in the Chronicle of Higher Education offers e-mail etiquette for faculty to teach their students. Read it, pass it on, enforce in your syllabi, and then check out this hilarious thread on the Chronicle forums of “favorite” student e-mails. If that one’s too overwhelming for you (it’s got 546 pages, and counting!), this is also a gem: please answer!!!!!!!!.