Comments on: Blogs@Baruch Semester in Review: Part Three, Course Blogging http://cac.ophony.org/2009/12/16/blogsbaruch-semester-in-review-part-three-course-blogging/ Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:00:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Care to share? at bavatuesdays http://cac.ophony.org/2009/12/16/blogsbaruch-semester-in-review-part-three-course-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-40190 Care to share? at bavatuesdays Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:21:23 +0000 http://cac.ophony.org/?p=3119#comment-40190 [...] then there’s the inimitable Luke Waltzer whose recent four part post series that recaps the work he and Mikhail Gershovich have been doing with Blogs@Baruch (you can [...] [...] then there’s the inimitable Luke Waltzer whose recent four part post series that recaps the work he and Mikhail Gershovich have been doing with Blogs@Baruch (you can [...]

]]> By: Luke http://cac.ophony.org/2009/12/16/blogsbaruch-semester-in-review-part-three-course-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-40165 Luke Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:20:30 +0000 http://cac.ophony.org/?p=3119#comment-40165 Thanks, Hillary. I'll leave the nitty-gritty of the assessment details to Prof Eversley, if she wishes to chime in; honestly, I'm not sure what other assignments they had to do or how their overall grades were determined. Thanks, Hillary. I’ll leave the nitty-gritty of the assessment details to Prof Eversley, if she wishes to chime in; honestly, I’m not sure what other assignments they had to do or how their overall grades were determined.

]]> By: Hillary http://cac.ophony.org/2009/12/16/blogsbaruch-semester-in-review-part-three-course-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-40162 Hillary Mon, 21 Dec 2009 01:42:27 +0000 http://cac.ophony.org/?p=3119#comment-40162 Great series of posts, Luke, and this one is especially interesting-- intrepid is right. Your suggestion that these multimedia assignments increase student engagement is no doubt evidenced in these (amazing) videos. Maybe it's just that I'm creating final grades as we speak, but I'd love some more nitty gritty assessment details; if these pod/vodcasts were not a substitute for more critical engagement, how were they weighted within the overall course? These two videos seem to have taken up a good chunk of student time and energy; did they slide right alongside all of the other projects and assignments, or did the profs need to sacrifice anything to squeeze these in? Great series of posts, Luke, and this one is especially interesting– intrepid is right. Your suggestion that these multimedia assignments increase student engagement is no doubt evidenced in these (amazing) videos.

Maybe it’s just that I’m creating final grades as we speak, but I’d love some more nitty gritty assessment details; if these pod/vodcasts were not a substitute for more critical engagement, how were they weighted within the overall course? These two videos seem to have taken up a good chunk of student time and energy; did they slide right alongside all of the other projects and assignments, or did the profs need to sacrifice anything to squeeze these in?

]]> By: UfoliO Project » Blog Archive » Diigo Annotations 12/18/2009 http://cac.ophony.org/2009/12/16/blogsbaruch-semester-in-review-part-three-course-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-40121 UfoliO Project » Blog Archive » Diigo Annotations 12/18/2009 Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:39:16 +0000 http://cac.ophony.org/?p=3119#comment-40121 [...] Blogs@Baruch Semester in Review: Part Three, Course Blogging at cac.ophony.org [...] [...] Blogs@Baruch Semester in Review: Part Three, Course Blogging at cac.ophony.org [...]

]]>