A Paean to Print Media

Paper Massacre
Creative Commons License photo credit: Vanessa Roanhorse

I recently moved from a brownstone to a large multi-story apartment building. One of the casualties of this move was my apparently unrealistic expectation that when you get a newspaper delivered to you daily, you will always have a blue-plastic wrapped paper lovingly waiting for you when you wake up in the morning and put some pants and flip-flops on to retrieve it. After three days in a row of having my paper poached by some unscrupulous new neighbor, I did what any self-respecting thirty-something graduate student would do: I griped about it on Facebook. (Well, after calling the paper for re-delivery, that is).

While many people have expressed sympathy about the paper-poaching, some people I’ve complained to, both virtually and face-to-face, have also expressed surprise that I get the newspaper delivered to me daily. The expense of daily delivery is one aspect of the surprise (to which my reply is: bourgie habits die hard), but some are also amazed that I actually read the paper in print form. “Why don’t you just read it online?” they ask.

So, I’ve been trying to articulate why I prefer to read my paper in 3-D rather than online. Here are just three reasons:

  • It’s part of my morning ritual. Every morning, 7 days a week, I like to sit at my kitchen table and read the paper while I eat my breakfast and drink my coffee. If I read it online, I’d have to bring my laptop to the kitchen, or bring my breakfast to my desk, which is a personal boundary I shall not cross. (And don’t even think about suggesting I scroll through the headlines on my iPod in between sips of coffee and bites of granola).
  • The sensory experience. Feeling newsprint between your fingers, smelling traces of ink, hearing the scratch of paper as you turn pages: you lose the tactile experience when you read online.  Perhaps it is my history as a former zinester that led me to appreciate the allure of physical paper. Analog rules.
  • The reading experience. I read differently when the copy is printed on a page in my hands as opposed to appearing on a screen in front of me. I like being able to visually scan a large page, or easily flip to another page, rather than having to (primarily) scroll vertically and click on links. The content and quantity of my reading also changes depending on format. The printed paper is curated differently from the online version, leading to a different cumulative narrative of headlines and stories. When I read a physical paper, I tend to look at every page, scanning all headlines and reading what appeals to me. When I read the paper online, my eye gravitates to what is on top and in the middle and in large print, rarely scrolling down to read or click on the smaller headlines. My attention span wanders. I veer off to read other sites. I end up reading less, and being less informed.

I know, I know, despite my preference for print, the newspaper industry is dying. But what do other people think about print versus online? Do you read print newspapers, or are you primarily an online reader? What are your reasons either way?

E-mail Etiquette

E-mails from your students driving you crazy? The latest “Ms. Mentor” column in the Chronicle of Higher Education offers e-mail etiquette for faculty to teach their students. Read it, pass it on, enforce in your syllabi, and then check out this hilarious thread on the Chronicle forums of “favorite” student e-mails. If that one’s too overwhelming for you (it’s got 546 pages, and counting!), this is also a gem: please answer!!!!!!!!.

The New York Times asks, “Is voice mail obsolete?”

An article appeared in the April 1st edition of the New York Times about the (possibly?) inevitable disappearance of voice mail, as people, especially younger folks, turn to and prefer text-messaging and email.

What’s wrong with voice mail? Well, according to the article, IT TAKES TOO LONG TO CHECK.

But in an age of instant information gratification, the burden of having to hit the playback button — or worse, dial in to a mailbox and enter a pass code — and sit through “ums” and “ahs” can seem too much to bear.

Or how about, IT’S REALLY CONFUSING. AND TIRING.

“If you left a message, I have to dial in, dial in my code,” Ms. Cheong said. “Then I mess up and redial. Then once I hear the message, I need the phone number. I try to write it down, and then I have to rewind the message to hear it again,” she added, feigning exhaustion.

Hmm… I don’t know. Is this just another silly trend piece about the short-attention span of the youth of today and their addiction to cutting-edge technology? Or do you think voice mail will go the way of the VCR, into the dustbins of techno-history?

If my dad can make a movie, so can you

My dad, who has worked in the field of ESL for several decades, sent me a link to a goofy movie he “made” this morning, which he describes as “An exercise in communication.”

I vant to learn Inglich

After watching the video, I became intrigued with the site where he made it, xtra normal, which has the motto “If you can type, you can make movies.” You choose the scenery and characters, provide text, add sounds, camera angles, movements, and a few other features, and a 3-D animated video is created. It’s still in beta, and has some quirks that need to be ironed out, but add this to your tool box of “Gee whiz!” fun things you can do on the Internet. Of course, I had to play around with this new tool, and got hooked. So I put together this silly little video introducing this blog.

Warning: once you start playing around on this site, it is extremely hard to stop.

Attack of the Grade-Grubbers?

If you have ever taught a college course, you might be familiar with the “grade-grubber,” that is, that special species of student who is never satisfied with the grade that he or she has earned, but is always keening for you to bump them up a half-letter or higher. On Tuesday, the New York Times published an article about the clash between student expectations and the grades they receive from professors, and it is currently their most emailed article. Professors interviewed attribute a rise in grade disputes variously to an increased sense of entitlement, competition among peers, and “ultra-efficient” test-prep in their K-12 education. Most interesting was the explanation that students have a misunderstanding about what grades actually reflect:

James Hogge, associate dean of the Peabody School of Education at Vanderbilt University, said: “Students often confuse the level of effort with the quality of work. There is a mentality in students that ‘if I work hard, I deserve a high grade.’ “

In line with Dean Hogge’s observation are Professor Greenberger’s test results. Nearly two-thirds of the students surveyed said that if they explained to a professor that they were trying hard, that should be taken into account in their grade.

Jason Greenwood, a senior kinesiology major at the University of Maryland echoed that view.

“I think putting in a lot of effort should merit a high grade,” Mr. Greenwood said. “What else is there really than the effort that you put in?”

“If you put in all the effort you have and get a C, what is the point?” he added. “If someone goes to every class and reads every chapter in the book and does everything the teacher asks of them and more, then they should be getting an A like their effort deserves. If your maximum effort can only be average in a teacher’s mind, then something is wrong.”

So, if grade-grubbing is a widespread phenomenon, and is at least in part a function of students not grasping the difference between merit and effort, what can we do to counteract this? How do we more effectively communicate our expectations to students? Do you provide a grade-breakdown in your syllabi? Do you give students access to grade calculators via online classroom management systems such as Blackboard? Do you provide students with the rubrics you use to grade their work?

As an aside, what do you think was missing from this Times article? I saw nary a mention of how the commercialization of higher education and the-customer-is-always-right mentality plays into student entitlement.

The Semiotics of Email

The American Journal of Sociology has published a study by Daniel A. Menchik and Xiaoli Tian on the semiotics of email (h/t contexts).  According to the abstract:

E‐mail excludes the multiple nonlinguistic cues and gestures that facilitate face‐to‐face communication. How, then, should interaction in a text‐based context be understood? The authors analyze the problems and solutions experienced by a research panel that communicated over e‐mail and face‐to‐face for 18 months, evaluating both kinds of exchanges alongside survey and interview data. Semiotic and linguistic theory is used to expose essential properties associated with the successful communication of meaning in each context. The authors find that e‐mail requires the cultivation of new techniques for specifically conveying the “pragmatic information” that connects the meaning of words to their users. Such information is assigned in e‐mail through the use of what are termed emphatic, referential, and characterizing semiotic tactics. These tactics are also evident in sustained online interactions studied by other researchers. This theoretical vocabulary represents an alternative to the dominant sociological characterization of e‐mail as an inferior substitute for face‐to‐face interaction.

The full article can be reached here. Thoughts?

Texting as Pet Peeve

In a faculty workshop on commenting on student writing that Diana and I facilitated last week, we discussed the feeling of being overwhelmed by such “lower order” concerns as spelling and grammatical errors and stylistic problems.  One technique to counteract this is WAC guru John Bean’s “pet peeve” approach.  Pick one or two of your own personal pet peeves about students’ writing, such as use of passive voice or subject-verb agreement, and restrict your lower order comments only to these pet peeves. You can even change it up every semester.

Now, when I first read about this approach, I immediately thought of my number one pet peeve: students’ use of texting lingo in their writing.  You know, “Marx wants u 2 throw off ur chains but Durkheim says those chains are solidarity LOL.”

But according to David Crystal, author of txtng: the gr8 db8, text-messaging is a new linguistic form that helps build literacy.  He writes,

All the popular beliefs about texting are wrong, or at least debatable. Its graphic distinctiveness is not a totally new phenomenon. Nor is its use restricted to the young generation. There is increasing evidence that it helps rather than hinders literacy. And only a very tiny part of the language uses its distinctive orthography. A trillion text messages may seem a lot, but when we set these alongside the multi-trillion instances of standard orthography in everyday life, they appear as no more than a few ripples on the surface of the sea of language. Texting has added a new dimension to language use, indeed, but its long-term impact on the already existing varieties of language is likely to be negligible. It is not a bad thing.

So, am I being a technophobic Luddite every time I want to circle in bright red pen every single instance of txt-speak in my students’ papers?  You can read an excerpt of his book and hear Crystal expound on this more at NPR’s Talk of the Nation.

“Songs of freedom kept coming…”

Remember Wyclef Jean’s “If I Was President”?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9pq_3OheqzU[/youtube]

Watching the video now, I can’t help but think about how much of the song and the imagery both predicts and falls short of our current moment. It presents the idea of a Black man as president as a desirable possibility paired with the worry that it may ultimately be dangerous for the person elected. So, the chorus makes me kind of… nervous. However, the song has to be historicized: it was released around the time of the last presidential election, which had a totally different political climate. More importantly, it is certainly not about our current President-elect, who was barely on the national radar at the time. Despite the nerve-wracking chorus, the song is ultimately one of hope and dreaming for things like an end to war and poverty, better schools in the ‘hood, and a cure for AIDS and cancer.

I bring up Wyclef’s video because I just saw will.i.am’s new video, in which cynicism and fear have been replaced by pure joy and celebration.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHWByjoQrR8[/youtube]

What a difference four years makes. It’s like Wyclef went to sleep four years ago dreaming of being president, and will.i.am woke up “feeling brand new/ ’cause the dreams that I’ve been dreamin/ finally came true.”

Finally, there’s no official video yet, but what do people think about Nas’s “Black President”? You can find fan videos on youtube, or listen to it at his myspace page.

Seniors and Communication Technology

A few weekends ago I schlepped to Florida to celebrate my grandmother’s 99th birthday.  Being almost a century old, her vision and hearing is just not what it used to be, which makes communicating with others quite difficult for her.  However, I was amazed by how much technology is available for her and other seniors (and other visually- and hearing-impaired folks).  She had a hearing aid, which is pretty standard, but also a special phone with large numbers and a light that flashes when someone calls in case she doesn’t hear it ring.

The two pieces of technology that really blew me away, however, were a printing device called Presto, and an enlarger.  The enlarger looks like a combination TV/overhead projector.  If there is something my grandmother wants to read, she places it on the machine, and it appears enlarged on the screen.  This enables her to read everything from the directions on prescription bottles, to her favorite philosophical texts, to emails from her grandchildren.

That’s right–my 99 year old grandmother loves email!  My grandmother is unable to use a computer, but we can send her emails through the Presto machine, which looks like a regular HP printer.  Over the weekend that I visited, daily horoscopes arrived, and several birthday wishes.  After the emails are printed, all she has to do is walk them over to her enlarger and boom–she is able to remain connected with friends, family, and the outside world.

The best communication I have with my grandmother, however, is decidedly low-tech.  It is face-to-face, looking her directly in the eyes, squeezing her hands, and telling her that I love her.  However, because we live a thousand miles away from each other, and the phone has become an impossible barrier, email has to suffice.  As soon as I got home from my trip, I sent her an email filled with photographs of our visit.

Fortune Cookie Wisdom

After an MSG-laden meal of Chinese food recently, I opened up my fortune cookie to find the following words: “The most valuable of all talents is that of never using two words when one will do.”

Now, while this was not technically a fortune revealing my life’s destiny, the words on the little scrap of paper did offer guidance for future endeavors: to be succinct and precise in one’s use of language.  This is valuable advice for those struggling to improve their writing and oral communication skills (or their campaigns for electoral office).

This advice is also, apparently, quite old.  I’ve been reading A Circle of Quiet by Madeleine L’Engle (author of the children’s book A Wrinkle in Time), which is kind of messy and rambly, but is mostly about her experiences as a writer, teacher, mother and wife.  On page 149 she cites an anonymous poem written several centuries ago:

The written word
Should be clean as bone,
Clear as light,
Firm as stone.
Two words are not
As good as one.

So there you have it: a centuries’ old anonymous poet and a modern-day anonymous fortune cookie manufacturer are in agreement.  Keep it short and sweet.